| volume
42, 1982
Nixon
and Richardson / The
Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981: Consequences for Farm Operators
Harris
and Baker / Financing
East-central Illinois Farmers Who Hedge
Lamm
/ Investment
in Agriculture: An Empirical Analysis
Sundell
and Teigen / A
Reduced Form Model for PCA Interest Rates
Dahl,
Dobson, and Veium / Mandatory
Equity Retirement Plans and Cooperative Strength
Jones
and Mazzocco / Agricultural
Record Systems and the Information Needs of Farmers and Lenders
Abstracts
Nixon
and Richardson / The
Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981: Consequences for Farm Operators
<top>
The
passage of the Economic Recovery Tax Act of 1981 will enable most continuing
farm operators to realize a significant reduction in their income tax
liabilities. FLIPSIM II was utilized to simulate a typical farm
in the Texas Southern High Plains with a resulting tax savings of $20,000
over a 10-year planning horizon.
Harris
and Baker / Financing
East-central Illinois Farmers Who Hedge <top>
Survey
responses of lenders in east-central Illinois suggest that lender policy
toward financing of initial and maintenance margin funding may discourage
a farmers who needs margin fund financing in order to hedge. The
wide range of policy preference reported by lenders regarding hedge
financing seems to signal that potential crop hedgers seeking hedge
financing would do well to search for a lender with the hedging policies
that best suit their particular needs. Certain differences in
responses by type of lender (banks versus Production Credit Associations)
are statistically significant.
Lamm
/ Investment
in Agriculture: An Empirical Analysis <top>
This
paper applies generally accepted macroeconomic investment theories to
explain aggregate agricultural investment behavior. Empirical
results indicate that changes in agricultural output, farm-level prices,
and the cost of capital have statistically significant effects on the
real farm investment. A Bischoff-type investment function id found
to fit the data best. The findings show specifically that a 1-percent
increase in output or farm prices causes a $.11 billion to $.24 billion
increase in real agricultural investment, while increases in the cost
of capital have a substantial negative effect on investment. Implications
are that investment will likely be more unstable in the future.
Sundell
and Teigen / A
Reduced Form Model for PCA Interest Rates <top>
This
paper derives a simple unrestricted reduced form model for Production
Credit Associations interest rates, primarily for prediction purposes,
that can be easily integrated in to macroeconomic and agricultural econometric
models. The performance of the basic model is compared with tow
more complicated variants of the basic model on both an in-sample and
out-of-sample basis. The results indicates that although the more
complicated variants performed better on an in-sample basis, the basic
model had a superior out-of-sample forecasts.
Dahl,
Dobson, and Veium / Mandatory
Equity Retirement Plans and Cooperative Strength <top>
America's
agricultural cooperatives are experiencing pressures from members and
legislation to lessen financial sacrifices of members and retire equity
capital members who die, retire, or leave the cooperative's service
area. Proposals have been raised as the feasibility of cooperatives
adopting mandatory equity retirement practices to remedy various management
problems. Results of a study conducted in Wisconsin, however,
suggest that mandatory equity retirement plans would severely reduce
solvency and financial strength for most cooperatives included in the
study.
Jones
and Mazzocco / Agricultural
Record Systems and the Information Needs of Farmers and Lenders <top>
Agricultural
accounting is a major source of data for evaluating the economic performance
of farm units and the agricultural sector as a whole. As interested
data users adjust the scope of their analyses, their data needs change. These changes are in turn translated into adjustments into the accounting
systems which gather relevant information. This report uses three
surveys to identify how users of accounting systems have influences
the structure of those systems. The survey results indicate probable
directions agricultural accounting will follow given the unsatisfied
needs of report users.
<top>
Send
questions and comments to Faye Butts: fsb1@cornell.edu
This
page was last modified on:
04/06/04
|